Radiometric dating christian

Most of these early geologists were Christians of one sort or another, and a number of them were quite orthodox in their theology.These early geologists—along with modern geologists—observed a rock record that tells a story.It turns out that “wrong” radiometric dates are often helpful, and provide additional insights into geologic history. Hebert’s arguments, it is important to emphasize that geologists do not believe that our planet is many millions of year old because of radiometric dating.Young-Earth creationists regularly attack radiometric dating techniques, thinking that if they discredit these methods they will undermine the idea of an ancient Earth, but this is not the case.All of this biased the results in favor of a younger Earth. Hebert stated that radiocarbon dating assumes the same ratio of carbon-14 (radiocarbon) in the atmosphere for thousands of years.I was really surprised that he said this; perhaps my notes are wrong.

Volcanoes are complex features representing numerous eruptions, coral reefs do not grow in just a few days (especially in muddy floodwaters), and many metamorphic processes involve the extremely slow diffusion of ions through solid crystalline structures.One is by groundwater contamination, which brings atmospheric carbon-14 into underground systems.This would be particularly effective at bringing carbon-14 into coal.I also cannot think of a single geological process that is inconsistent with an Earth that is many millions of years old.ICR’s Radioisotopes and the Age of The Earth (RATE) program studied zircon mineral grains from a geothermal well in New Mexico.

Leave a Reply